Tag Archive for: Accountability

Coaching, CoachStation, Culture, Employee Engagement, Leadership, Leadership Capability, Leadership Development, Onboarding, People Development, Peter Principle, Prioritisation, Reputation, Trust

Leadership Capability and the Peter Principle

CoachStation | Leadership Thinking

The Peter Principle Is Not Theory. It Is Your Organisation.

Why promoting capable people without preparing them is the most overlooked leadership risk in business today, and what a systemic solution actually looks like.

The Peter Principle, And Why It Still Matters

In 1969, Canadian educator Laurence J. Peter and playwright Raymond Hull published what would become one of the most quoted, least applied observations in organisational life. The book was written as satire. A deliberate, sardonic skewering of corporate hierarchy that arrived on shelves before Dilbert, before The Office, before any of the cultural shorthand we now use to describe workplace dysfunction.

A note on origins. Peter and Hull never intended the book as a management manifesto. It was satire, complete with invented examples, mock-academic language, and a dry wit designed to expose the absurdity of how organisations actually operate. What they did not anticipate was how accurately the joke reflected reality. The book became an immediate bestseller. The term entered the language. And the research that followed over the next five decades consistently found that the punchline was, in fact, true.

The principle itself is simple:

"In a hierarchy, every employee tends to rise to their level of incompetence."

Peter's argument was not a critique of individuals. It was a critique of systems. Organisations, he observed, routinely reward people for what they have done rather than evaluating whether they are capable of what they are being asked to do next. The result is predictable: high performers accumulate promotions until they land in roles where their previous strengths no longer serve them.

More than five decades after a satirist put words to the pattern, it plays out every week in organisations across every sector and size. The high-performing individual who transitions into leadership and visibly struggles. The reliable operator who becomes avoidant and reactive under the weight of people responsibility. The capable contributor who never quite finds their footing as a manager.

This is not bad luck, and it is not a character flaw. It is a predictable outcome of how most organisations still think about promotion and leadership readiness.

What the Research Has Since Confirmed

A 2019 study published in the Quarterly Journal of Economics examined data from 214 companies and over 1,500 sales managers. The findings were direct: organisations consistently promoted their best salespeople into management roles, and those same individuals consistently underperformed as managers. The better someone was at their individual role, the more likely they were to be promoted, and the less likely they were to succeed in the role that followed.

The mechanism is straightforward. Technical excellence in a functional role does not transfer automatically to the relational, strategic, and accountability-oriented demands of leading people. Yet the promotion decision is almost always made on the basis of functional performance.

The Peter Principle is not a theory about individuals failing. It is a theory about systems that guarantee certain individuals will be set up to fail.

The more important question is not whether this is happening in your organisation. The more important question is what you are doing about it.

Promotion Without Preparation Is Not a Gap. It Is a Decision.

Most organisations have a de facto promotion framework, even if they would not describe it that way. The criteria are familiar: technical skill, results delivered, time in role, and in some cases, seniority. These are observable, defensible, and easy to justify in a performance conversation.

The problem is not that these criteria are wrong. The problem is that they are incomplete.

What most promotions are based on

Technical skill and functional expertise

Individual results and output

Tenure and institutional knowledge

Visibility and perceived potential

What leadership actually requires

Communication across functions and levels

Accountability and follow-through with others

Emotional intelligence under pressure

Decision-making with incomplete information

These are different skills entirely. More than that, they require a fundamentally different orientation. Individual contribution is largely about your own performance. Leadership is about creating conditions for others to perform. The shift from one to the other is not incremental. For many people, it requires a significant recalibration of identity, behaviour, and how they measure their own success.

What This Looks Like in Practice

The best salesperson becomes a poor sales manager, not because they stop caring, but because they have no framework for coaching the behaviours they themselves execute intuitively. The strongest operator becomes avoidant under the weight of people complexity, defaulting to doing rather than leading. The reliable team member, elevated into a supervisory role, becomes overwhelmed and reactive, struggling to hold others to standards they have always met without thinking.

In none of these cases is the person incapable. In most cases, they were simply never prepared for the role they were given. The organisation assumed that competence was transferable. It rarely is without deliberate support.

The intent to develop people and the actions that actually develop them are not the same thing. Most organisations know this. Far fewer close the gap.

CoachStation Briefing Paper

Leadership Development: Intent vs Action

This leadership briefing explores the gap between what organisations say they invest in and what leaders actually experience. If you are responsible for leadership capability, it is worth reading before your next investment decision.

Download Our Breifing Paper →

The Hidden Cost: Quiet Leadership Failure Is Still Failure

When people picture leadership failure, they tend to picture something dramatic. A manager who loses their team's confidence overnight. A leader whose decisions create a visible crisis. A restructure that follows a sustained period of poor outcomes.

The Peter Principle rarely produces these moments. What it produces instead is something quieter, more expensive, and far harder to attribute.

What Quiet Leadership Failure Actually Looks Like

—Performance conversations that are delayed, diluted, or never happen at all

—Decisions deferred to avoid conflict rather than made to drive progress

—Standards that vary across teams and managers, with no consistent accountability

—Talented people leaving without anyone being entirely sure why

—A culture that tolerates underperformance because confronting it feels harder than absorbing it

None of these show up as a single incident. They accumulate. Over time, they compound into culture drift, reduced engagement, and business outcomes that consistently fall short of what the strategy intended. The gap between what the organisation says it values and how it actually operates widens, often without anyone explicitly making it happen.

This is the real cost of the Peter Principle. Not dramatic failure, but sustained mediocrity that becomes the norm.

The Framing Problem

Most organisations frame leadership capability as a development priority. That framing is not wrong, but it is insufficient. When something is positioned as development, it occupies a different category in organisational thinking than when it is positioned as risk management.

Leadership capability is not a development investment. It is risk mitigation. Organisations that have not built it are not behind on growth. They are exposed.

When decision quality declines because leaders lack the confidence or framework to make calls, that is a commercial problem. When accountability weakens because managers avoid difficult conversations, that is a performance problem. When engagement falls because people do not feel led well, that is a retention problem. None of these begin with a leadership development budget line. They begin with a gap in capability that was never addressed at the point of transition.

The organisations that take leadership capability seriously do not do so because they are committed to people development as a philosophy. They do so because they have worked out that the alternative is expensive.

Falling Into Leadership: When Theory Becomes Someone's Reality

There is a moment most leaders remember, even if they do not talk about it openly. The moment they realised the role they had been given was not the role they had been prepared for. The moment the expectations landed, and the gap between what was required and what they felt equipped to do became impossible to ignore.

Falling Into Leadership book by Steve and Kath Riddle

Falling Into Leadership captures that moment. Not as a theoretical construct. As a lived experience.

Sally, the protagonist, does not set out to become a leader. She is good at her work, reliable, capable, and trusted. Those qualities create the conditions for her promotion, without creating the conditions for her success in the role that follows. Her journey through the disorientation, pressure, and gradual recalibration of leading people for the first time is not an unusual story. It is one of the most common stories in organisational life, told across industries and levels every day.

Sally's story is a lived example of the Peter Principle playing out in real time. It gives readers something most leadership theory does not: recognition.

Recognition is not a soft outcome. For someone navigating the early stages of leadership without a framework, recognising that what they are experiencing is normal, predictable, and navigable is the starting point for change. The book provides that recognition, the language to name what is happening, and a grounded orientation toward what effective leadership actually requires.

Why Narrative Matters in Leadership Work

Diagnostic tools and frameworks are valuable. But most people do not begin engaging with their leadership gaps through a competency model. They begin when something resonates. When they read or hear something that reflects their experience back to them with enough accuracy that they are willing to look at it more closely.

That is what story does. And that is why Falling Into Leadership sits at the front of the CoachStation approach, not as a nice addition, but as a deliberate entry point for leaders who are ready to close the gap between where they are and where their role requires them to be.

Explore Falling Into Leadership →

The Solution: Leadership Infrastructure, Not a Development Program

Most organisations that take leadership seriously have some version of the same response: a program. A workshop series. A learning platform. An off-site. These are not without value, but they share a common limitation. They are events. The Peter Principle is not an event problem. It is a systems problem, and systems problems require systemic responses.

The CoachStation Ecosystem is built around this premise. It does not position leadership support as a discrete program that a leader completes. It positions it as connected infrastructure that operates across the moments that matter, from the point of transition through to sustained behavioural change in role.

What is the CoachStation Ecosystem? It is our full range of products, tools, and services, designed to encompass every stage and seniority of the leadership life cycle. From the moment someone steps into their first leadership role through to experienced executives navigating complex organisational challenges, the Ecosystem provides the right support at the right time. It is not a single program. It is a coordinated response to leadership as an ongoing discipline, not a one-time event.

A Closed-Loop Response to a Systemic Problem

The Challenge	CoachStation Response
Promotion without awareness or readiness	Falling Into Leadership creates recognition and shared language before problems embed
No structured leadership capability framework	The CoachStation Leadership Development Program builds skills and practice over time
Knowing what to do but not following through	One-to-one coaching embeds behavioural change in real leadership situations
No support between formal development moments	CoachBot supports ongoing reflection and thinking between sessions
No accountability structure reinforcing progress	Coach-supported, trusted relationships build the accountability structures leaders need to sustain change and hold their own standard

Each element addresses a different point in the failure cycle the Peter Principle describes. Together, they form something most leadership investment does not: a connected response that does not leave leaders to close the gaps themselves.

This is not a program. It is leadership infrastructure designed to prevent failure rather than react to it once the cost is already being paid.

The Commercial Argument

For senior leaders and boards considering this, the question is not whether leadership capability matters. It clearly does. The question is whether addressing it proactively is more or less expensive than absorbing the cost of underprepared leaders over time.

The research on this is consistent. The cost of replacing a mid-level leader, accounting for recruitment, onboarding, productivity loss, and team impact, routinely sits between 50 and 200 percent of that person's annual salary. That figure does not include the accumulated cost of the decisions not made well, the performance conversations not held, and the engagement that quietly deteriorated while the problem remained unaddressed.

Prevention is not a softer option than response. It is the more commercially rational one.

See how the CoachStation Ecosystem fits together →

Related Framework

Why Leaders Struggle Under Pressure

Leaders promoted beyond their capability often trigger threat responses across their teams without realising it. The SCARF model helps explain what is happening beneath the surface, and what to do about it.

Explore the SCARF Model

Stop Talking About Development. Start Talking About Risk.

Your biggest leadership risk is not poor hiring. It is promoting capable people without preparing them for what comes next. The Peter Principle is not inevitable. It is the predictable result of how you promote, what you prioritise, and what you invest in.

Explore How CoachStation Can Help

Feel free to Email, Print or Share and Comment.

Coaching, CoachStation, Effectiveness, Leadership, Leadership Development, Mentoring, People Development

How Is Coaching Success Defined and Measured?

How I Know When Coaching Has Actually Worked

My internal coaching scale is not about judgement or overthinking.

It is calibrated pattern recognition built through long exposure, real feedback, and one question that matters: how much has my coachee/client grown and developed?

Coaching conversation reflecting leadership development and insight

I have tracked coaching impact and benefit with my clients and coachees for over fifteen years. I do not use a formal scoring system or a checklist. I use a simple internal reference point. A quick numeric note that helps me answer one question honestly: did anything genuinely move here?

After every one or two sessions, I note where a client seems to be sitting on a scale most people never even talk about out loud. Over time, this becomes a living record of their development, not just a log of meetings.

The scale is not about whether someone “liked” the session. It is not a satisfaction score, a vibe check, or a measure of how smooth the conversation felt. It is a practical way of capturing something I care deeply about: real developmental movement. Not just insight, not just agreement, not just a good chat. Progress.

And here is the part that matters. What I am describing is not over-precision. It is calibrated pattern recognition built through long exposure and feedback. The numbers are not the insight. They are the shorthand I use to track what I am observing over time. These 'scores' are rarely, if ever, shared with anyone, but they help me to assess progress, prepare for each coaching session, and hold myself to account.

Most managers don’t set out to fail – but many do

No one starts their role as a new manager saying, “I’m going to be terrible at this.” Yet that is often what ends up happening. Many people effectively “fall into leadership”. They are promoted because they were good at their technical job, or because there was a gap to fill, not because they have been deliberately prepared for leadership.

Large surveys consistently show that a high proportion of managers receive little to no formal leadership training, becoming accidental managers overnight. At the same time, only a minority of people naturally possess the full set of talents required to manage others at a high level. The rest require structured development, deliberate practice, and ongoing support if they are going to lead effectively, rather than simply occupy a role.

In other words, managers are hugely consequential, most are under-prepared, and only a small proportion will reach their potential without intentional investment. When organisations treat leadership development and coaching as optional or 'soft,' they still pay for it in different ways. They pay through higher turnover, lower engagement, inconsistency in performance, and a steady erosion of culture and trust.

Why leadership coaching is a high-ROI investment

When organisations take the time to calculate the return on investment of coaching, the numbers are rarely marginal. Multiple studies and meta-analyses over the past two decades have reported median returns of five to seven times the original investment in executive coaching, once gains in productivity, decision-making quality, and retention are taken into account. Some large-scale programs have reported ROI in the hundreds of percent when they track outcomes carefully over time.

Importantly, those results are not just about feel good factors. They show up in tangible metrics that matter to executives and boards. Lower turnover in key roles, improved performance of critical teams, reduced time to effectiveness for new leaders, better internal mobility, fewer escalations, and more effective succession. In many organisations, leaders who receive coaching are more likely to be promoted and more likely to be retained. I have seen these benefits first-hand, for both the leader and organisation, plus their teams, and lives outside of the workplace.

Coaching also changes the texture of daily leadership. Leaders who have been coached well tend to run better 1:1's, give clearer feedback, build accountability more fairly, and create more psychologically safe environments for their teams. Those patterns drive engagement, innovation, and performance in ways that compounding policies alone cannot match.

Coaching as strategic advantage, not just remediation

This is why leadership coaching has shifted, globally, from being a remedial fix for struggling executives to a strategic capability-builder. More and more, coaching is being offered proactively to high-potential leaders, new managers, and critical stakeholders, as part of their development pathway and planning, not as a 'last resort' or when remedial coaching becomes necessary.

Organisations with stronger leadership development and coaching cultures consistently outperform their peers on key indicators. They are more likely to report higher revenue per employee, stronger profitability, and better engagement and retention outcomes. The reason is simple. Leadership quality scales the impact of every other investment you make across strategy, technology, process, and structure.

In Falling Into Leadership, I explore this distinction between accidental leadership and deliberate leadership. Coaching, applied effectively, is one of the most practical ways to move someone from simply 'falling into' a role to consciously owning, shaping, and growing their leadership practice over time.

How my internal scale links to real-world impact

My personal scale is a way of making that shift visible. Each small increment reflects a change in how a leader is thinking, deciding, and behaving. The difference between someone who has landed in a role and someone who is actively stepping into leadership.

At one level, I pay attention to the immediate experience of the work: perceived value, relevance, psychological safety, and the quality of the relationship. In formal programs, this can show up as satisfaction scores, likelihood to recommend coaching, completion rates, and engagement metrics. These do not prove behaviour change, but they tell us whether the experience is strong enough to create the conditions for change.

At the next level, I look at what the leader is actually building: capability, confidence, and new options. That can be captured through pre‑ and post‑leadership competency assessments, shifts in 360‑degree feedback, and the rate at which coaching goals are achieved. This is where we start to see the difference between someone who has simply been exposed to new ideas and someone who is genuinely developing their leadership.

Then there is behaviour: what the leader does differently in the real world. Here, I look for evidence in observable leadership behaviour, manager‑effectiveness ratings from their teams, better performance and feedback conversations, and self‑reported increases in confidence when dealing with complex or uncomfortable situations. My small numeric shifts are a shorthand for these patterns, helping me track whether the person is still largely 'falling into' situations or deliberately choosing how they want to lead.

Finally, there is the organisational impact. Depending on the context, that might include internal promotion rates, strength of succession pipelines, retention and engagement in key teams, fewer escalations, or improvements in revenue, productivity, customer experience, or safety metrics. My internal scale does not replace those measures. It connects them back to what is happening with actual human beings in leadership roles. It helps us see the line between conversation, behaviour, and result.

When these layers are aligned, you no longer have to guess whether coaching is working. You can track how a shift in how a leader thinks and behaves is influencing the people around them and, ultimately, the outcomes the organisation cares about.

The increments are experience-based pattern recognition, not mathematical

A common assumption is that a 0.5 shift, or even a 0.2 shift, must be made up. As if it is just rounding, or personal preference, or some obsessive attempt to quantify something that cannot be quantified.

That assumption misses the point. The increments are grounded in what I see and hear, not mathematical. They reflect lived, observable changes in the person in front of me. I am tracking qualitative signals, then mapping them onto a numeric shorthand so I can see movement over time without writing a full essay after every session.

Subtle shifts in behaviour and subsequent score movement are often visible in things like:

How quickly a client locates the real issue, without circling it for twenty minutes
How much responsibility they take, without needing me to coax them into ownership
How their language, posture, and certainty shift while we are still talking
How intently insight converts into behaviour, not intention

This is why I can define a 0.5 shift. Not because I am chasing precision or making judgements for their own sake, but because when you watch enough leaders over enough years, you start to recognise stable patterns. You learn the difference between 'that makes sense' and 'something has genuinely changed.'

This is how real expertise works

People sometimes think experts have a neat model first, and then apply it. In reality, many experts build the model from repeated exposure and micro-comparisons, then develop language afterwards.

You see this with senior clinicians, experienced professionals, and elite coaches. They often know something is different before they can explain why, because the pattern‑recognition model lives below conscious thought. It is reinforced by outcomes, not theory. It is built through feedback, consequences, repetition, and time.

Leadership development is no different. Over time, you can feel the difference between cognitive agreement and internal ownership. Between reflection and self‑directed action. Between a leader who is saying the “right” things, and a leader who is already changing how they lead.

What a 7/10 actually is

It is solid, effective work that looks and feels like:

Engaged, attentive, respectful
Clearly finding value
Tracking the thinking
Leaving with useful insight
Translating the discussions into their own world
Reflecting, applying, practicing and learning from doing

In other words, it is a solid session. Nothing missing, nothing wrong. Most coaches, facilitators and practitioners would happily call it a strong result, and they would be right.

What an >7/10 actually is

This is qualitatively different, not incrementally better, looking and feeling like:

The client is fully in the zone, not just present
You can feel internal re‑orientation happening live
They are slightly slowed or unsettled, in a productive way
Their language starts to shift mid‑session
They are already projecting forward, not just reflecting back
After the session, you see behavioural signals, not just cognitive agreement

The most important marker is this: the follow‑through begins before you ask for it.

That is the difference between "that was really useful" and "something important has moved here."

I often use a tennis analogy when I am explaining this to leaders. To play at a higher level, you have to practice. You have to pick up the racket and get on the court, again and again. Instinctively, people understand this when it comes to sport or learning a technical skill. No one expects to play good tennis without repetition, coaching, feedback, and time. Yet when it comes to leadership, many people quietly believe there must be shortcuts. That experience alone, or a title, or good intentions should be enough.

It does not work that way. Leadership is more complex than tennis because you are working with people, not a racket and balls. The gap is the same though. It is the difference between simply lobbing the ball over the net and hitting a clean, powerful forehand down the line. Just because you are in a role of authority, managing others, or playing tennis alongside other managers in your organisation, does not mean you are playing at the same level. We are all on the court. The difference is not whether we are playing, it is how well we are playing.

Why some sessions sit at 7, even when the work is excellent

Sometimes a session cannot reach an 8.5 moment in the room, even with high quality coaching, because the issue is structurally complex. It sits at the intersection of authority, identity, ownership, family systems, or long‑term stakes. The person is still emotionally inside the system.

In those conditions, integration often happens between sessions, not during them. A great session might be the one that creates the space for reflection to land later. The scale helps me pace that properly, not push too hard, and not pretend a breakthrough has happened just because the conversation was productive.

From individual shifts to coaching culture

Over time, the real ROI appears not just in individual leaders but in the culture they create. When managers consistently act like coaches, asking better questions, building ownership, and expecting people to think for themselves, organisations tend to see higher retention, stronger engagement, and more innovation. These outcomes are a result of problem‑solving no longer bottlenecked at the top.

My internal scale is a small, practical tool that helps move organisations in that direction. It ensures that we are not just 'doing coaching,' but building leadership capacity in ways that can be seen, felt, and measured, so leaders don’t simply fall into leadership, they grow into it.

The point of naming this

I have rarely articulated this publicly because most people do not need the granularity. Without context, it can sound abstract. With context, it becomes useful. It helps explain the difference between good work and work that lands. It also gives leaders a more honest way of assessing their own progress.

I am not using numbers to impress people. I am using numbers to tell the truth, to myself first. The truth about what moved. The truth about what did not. The truth about what I need to do differently next time.

We are all playing the game of leadership. Titles may get you onto the court, but they say nothing about the standard of your play. That is shaped by practice, attention, and follow‑through over time. The real difference between a useful session and genuine development is the same difference between simply keeping the ball in play and knowing how to hit the shot that matters when the pressure is on.

Key takeaways

A useful session is not the same as real development. Progress only counts when something changes in how a leader thinks, decides, or behaves after the conversation ends.

Insight is a starting point, not the outcome. What matters is how quickly insight translates into action, experimentation, and visible follow‑through in the real world.

Meaningful development often shows up in small shifts, not dramatic breakthroughs. When you know what to observe, incremental changes in language, ownership, and confidence signal genuine movement.

Detail only matters when it improves the quality of the work. It should help you pace conversations properly, prepare more deliberately, and hold yourself and others to account for what happens next.

Leadership capability is built through regular use. It develops when leaders return to the work consistently, practice deliberately under real conditions, and reflect honestly on what worked and what did not.

Real growth and development occur when leadership is approached as a skill to be owned, reviewed, and strengthened through regular practice, not something you simply fall into.

Practical actions you can use immediately

After your next leadership or coaching conversation, pause and ask: what actually shifted here, not what was discussed or agreed?
Identify one observable behaviour you expect to see within the next week, something that would clearly indicate progress, rather than intention.
Listen closely to your own language. Notice when you are speaking from ownership and choice, versus explanation, justification, or analysis.
Treat the next step as deliberate practice, try something in the real world, see what happens, and reflect on the outcome before adjusting your approach.

Related CoachStation Service

Leadership Coaching and Mentoring

If this article resonated, leadership coaching and mentoring with CoachStation provides the structure, tools, and accountability to turn insight into lasting change. Practical, personalised, and grounded in real-world experience.

Learn More

References and sources

International Coaching Federation (2024). Coaching Statistics: The ROI of Coaching in 2024. https://coachingfederation.org/blog/coaching-statistics-the-roi-of-coaching-in-2024/
International Coaching Federation (2025). 2025 ICF Global Coaching Study – Executive Summary. https://coachingfederation.org/resource/2025-icf-global-coaching-study-executive-summary/
Luisa Zhou (2026). 70+ Latest Coaching Statistics: ROI, Growth & AI (2026). https://luisazhou.com/blog/coaching-statistics/
Erickson Coaching International (2022). The Link Between Leadership Coaching and Retention Rates. https://www.erickson.edu/resources/the-link-between-leadership-coaching-and-retention-rates
Institute of Managers and Leaders ANZ (2025). ROI of Leadership Training and Its Impact on Retention. https://managersandleaders.com.au/leadership-training-roi-and-employee-retention/
McKinsey & Company (2023). New leadership in an era of thriving organizations. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/new-leadership-for-a-new-era-of-thriving-organizations
Co-Active Training Institute (2025). When Leaders Coach: The Real ROI of Empowerment. https://coactive.com/blog/the-real-roi-of-empowerment/
Falling Into Leadership, Steve Riddle. https://coachstation.com.au/falling-into-leadership/

Feel free to Email, Print or Share and Comment.

CoachStation, Communication, Effectiveness, Emotional Intelligence, Employee Engagement, Leadership, Leadership Development, Mentoring, News, People Development, Relationships, Remote Leadership, Remote Management, Self-Awareness, Self-esteem, Victim Mentality

Stop Rescuing, Start Leading: Managing the Victim Mindset

Every leader eventually meets a team member who plays the victim. Nothing is ever their fault, every hurdle comes from someone else, and solutions always feel just out of reach. These patterns drain energy, slow progress, and can infect an entire team if left unaddressed. The truth is, no amount of empathy or 'fixing' will create change until accountability enters the conversation.

At CoachStation, we often see leaders fall into the trap of rescuing, where they stepp in to solve, soften, or shield. It feels supportive, but it keeps the person stuck. Leadership is not about carrying others; it’s about enabling them to carry themselves. The most effective leaders draw a line between support and rescue, using clarity and boundaries to move their team members from helplessness to ownership. That is where growth, and leadership, really begins.

Leadership is about enabling others to carry themselves, not carrying them.

It is understandable to a degree why a leader does this. It comes from a position of care and wanting to help. However, it is not effective leadership and rarely leads to a change in acknowledgment of the problem and behaviour. Managing a victim mindset takes courage, structure, and emotional intelligence. It requires you to hold the mirror up without becoming the villain. You can learn how to stop rescuing and start leading.

1. Spot the Pattern Early

Victim behaviour follows a script: avoidance, blame, deflection, and helplessness. Recognising it early prevents small issues from becoming entrenched habits. Look beyond words to tone and intent. A victim often positions themselves as powerless, waiting for rescue.

They externalise blame or justify underperformance.
They resist feedback by framing it as unfair or personal.
They draw energy from crisis or sympathy.

Recognise the pattern and address it privately, focusing on behaviour not character. See it as something learned that can be relearned through awareness and accountability.

2. Name and Frame What You See

Victim dynamics thrive in avoidance. Bringing behaviour into the light changes the rules of engagement. Use calm, factual language that separates emotion from observation.

"I have noticed that when challenges arise, the focus often shifts to what others did wrong rather than what you can control. Let’s explore what sits within your influence.”

Framing it this way shifts the conversation from accusation to possibility. You are not blaming, you are reframing responsibility as choice. This subtle distinction is where accountability begins to be understood, accepted and possible ownership shifts.

3. Shift from Emotion to Agency

Emotion drives the victim mindset, but agency rewires it. The goal is to move from helplessness to problem-solving; to replace 'I can’t' with 'I can choose.' Ask questions that pull the focus to what is within reach.

'What’s one thing you can influence here?'
'What would it look like if this went well?'
'What support do you need, and what can you do yourself?'

These questions teach accountability through reflection. Over time, they help the person see that their choices, not their circumstances, drive their results.

4. Stop the Rescue Loop

When leaders over-function, employees under-function. Every time you rescue, you reinforce dependency. Replace rescuing with responsibility. Let them carry their own challenges while you guide the process, not the outcome.

'That sounds tough. What’s your next step?'
'I trust you to work this through. What will you try first?'

Support does not mean shielding someone from consequence. True coaching builds capability, not comfort. When you hold back from rescuing, you create space for growth, resilience, and learning.

5. Apply Structure with REOWM

Unstructured conversations with victims drift into emotion and circular logic. The REOWM Accountability Model anchors every discussion in clarity and progression, guiding the conversation from relationships through to measurable outcomes.

Element	How to Apply It
Relationships	Show empathy without enabling. Respect their perspective, but stay objective.
Expectations	Clarify what is required and by when. Vague expectations feed avoidance. Ask what they understand is being committed to.
Observations	Ask for self-feedback first. Base your feedback on facts, not feelings. 'You missed two deadlines this month' is clear and defensible.
Why / Impact	Explain the consequence of their behaviour — on trust, workload, and team culture. Why are we discussing this? Do not assume what you think is what they know.
Measurement	Agree on what progress looks like. Review it consistently, even when uncomfortable.

Accountability is not punitive, it is developmental. The REOWM structure keeps both parties honest and aligned, even when the conversation gets difficult. The key benefit is that conversations that are accountable are easier because the commitment and agreement was made previously. Your role as a leader is to simply ask how they went against the task, goal etc. that they had previously committed to.

6. Hold the Line Consistently

Victim behaviour often tests consistency. The moment you waver, they will reset the narrative and regain control through confusion. Hold your line firmly, without aggression. Do not let the other person avoid through playing in the noise. Continue to pull them back to the point, quite commonly based on behaviours. Predictable leadership dismantles emotional manipulation faster than confrontation ever will.

'We discussed this and agreed the next step. I look forward to seeing that by Friday.'

When you stay calm and consistent, you communicate strength and safety, the very environment people need to shift from fear to ownership.

Conclusion

Leading someone out of a victim mindset takes patience and precision. It is not about winning an argument. It's about changing the story they tell themselves. The measure of leadership is not how much you fix, but how much you enable others to fix for themselves.

When you stop rescuing and start leading, accountability becomes a shared value, not a forced expectation. The result is a stronger culture, healthier relationships, and people who choose to step up rather than step back.

To continue your leadership journey, read Escape the Drama Triangle: Change the Script.

Related CoachStation Service

Leadership Coaching and Mentoring

Learn More

Feel free to Email, Print or Share and Comment.

News

How CS CoachBot Helps Our Clients & Coachees

In a world where leadership moves fast, CS CoachBot gives you on-demand support, clarity, and tools to lead with confidence, no matter the challenge.

CS CoachBot gives you instant access to practical leadership insights, coaching tools, and support, anytime you need it.

It’s like having a coach in your pocket, helping you think clearly, lead better, and stay on track.

This blog highlights the positive impact CS CoachBot has had on my clients and coachees in a very short period of time. In addition to our coaching, mentoring and workshop facilitation, the tool has facilitated personal growth, enhanced leadership effectiveness, and contributed to organisational success.

The Genesis of CoachStation

The inception of CoachStation was a journey rooted in self-discovery and a passion for leadership excellence. CoachStation was created with a clear objective: to make a real and sustainable difference in leadership and organisational development. Our commitment is to focus on the inputs that lead to results, nurturing effective leaders who can drive meaningful change in their organisations.

CS CoachBot has been purpose-built using real coaching insights, tools, and frameworks developed by CoachStation over the past decade. It draws on Steve’s leadership philosophy, proven coaching models like the CS REOWM Accountability Model, other tools and resources, and hundreds of real client scenarios (with confidentiality protected).

It was trained to reflect the language, tone, and approach used in CoachStation sessions, offering relevant, human-centred guidance in the moment you need it.

The Role of CS CoachBot in the Coaching Journey

CS CoachBot is a powerful support tool, designed to complement rather than replace the coaching experience. It helps clients build self awareness, reflect more deeply, and take intentional action. With structured prompts and curated insights, CS CoachBot strengthens the development process between sessions, making growth more consistent and measurable.

But it is important to be clear: technology alone does not coach. It cannot and does not replace the human connection, trust, and nuance that sits at the heart of great coaching. What it does do is extend the reach of that connection, providing reminders, frameworks, and space to think in between real conversations.

Used effectively, CS CoachBot brings together the best of both worlds, combining the efficiency and accessibility of technology with the wisdom and empathy of a real coaching relationship. It is not the coach. It is the companion to your coaching.

Client Success Stories and Real-World Impact

Since launching CS CoachBot, we have seen clear themes emerge from the way clients are using it. Many describe it as a steady prompt that keeps development front of mind between sessions. It helps them pause, reflect, and refocus when things get busy or unclear.

One client spoke about how using CS CoachBot gave them the nudge they needed to have a difficult but overdue conversation.

Another said it helped them make better decisions by thinking through their leadership challenges more intentionally.

Others have commented on how useful it is for checking in on progress and staying accountable, especially when they feel stuck or unsure.

These are not sweeping transformations. They are small, consistent shifts that build real change. That is what CS CoachBot is best at, making leadership development more visible, practical, and personal.

This section shares examples of how our resource is being used in different contexts, drawn directly from the experiences of managers and leaders just like you.

Most Common ThemesTo Date

The Struggle with Delegation and Control

Delegation and control are frequent topics among clients using CS CoachBot. As a leader, the ability to delegate is crucial for effective management, yet many struggle with letting go. This struggle often stems from a reluctance to relinquish control, driven by ego or a lack of trust in others.

Leaders may feel the need to oversee every detail, leading to micromanagement. In coaching sessions, the importance of delegation is recognised, but the challenge of truly letting go remains a common hurdle. CS CoachBot provides guidance on how to overcome these barriers, allowing leaders to empower their teams and focus on strategic goals.

By learning to trust their team members, leaders can foster a culture of accountability and innovation, ultimately leading to improved team performance and satisfaction.

Defining Your ‘Why’

Articulating your ‘why’ in leadership can be a challenging task. Many clients find it difficult to answer questions about their motivations during coaching sessions.

Self-reflection is key to understanding personal leadership motivations, yet it can be daunting for some. Reflecting on what went well and what could have been done differently in your leadership practices is essential for growth.

CS CoachBot encourages this introspection, helping you to clarify your purpose and align your actions with your values.

Understanding your ‘why’ not only provides direction but also inspires those around you, creating a shared sense of purpose and commitment within your team.

Effective Communication and Feedback

Communication skills and feedback are vital components of leadership, extensively covered in CoachStation workshops. Effective communication is not a negotiable ‘soft-skill’; it is essential for building strong relationships and leading successfully.

Many clients have questions and concerns about their communication abilities, recognising its impact on their leadership effectiveness. Offering objective feedback enhances self-awareness and decision-making, crucial for personal and professional development. CoachStation assists in honing these skills, ensuring you and your teams communicate with clarity and purpose.

By fostering an environment where open communication is encouraged, leaders can build trust and collaboration, leading to more effective problem-solving and innovation.

Goal Setting and Team Building

Goal setting and building effective teams are integral to leadership development. These themes frequently arise in discussions with clients using CS CoachBot. Effective teams contribute significantly to an organisation’s success, and setting clear goals is key to guiding them.

CS CoachBot assists in defining objectives and strategies for team building, ensuring that everyone is aligned and working towards common goals. By focusing on these areas, you can enhance your leadership capabilities and drive your organisation forward. Establishing clear goals not only provides direction but also motivates team members, fostering a sense of achievement and progress as milestones are reached.

In just a few months, CS CoachBot has become a valuable part of leadership development and coaching. It helps build self awareness, strengthen relationships, and support leadership growth in ways that create real outcomes for both individuals and organisations.

At CoachStation, we remain focused on making a lasting difference, helping managers and leaders feel confident in their roles and better equipped to support their teams.

This is more than a tool. It is a gift, created to provide insight, reflection, and support. It is available to anyone who is ready to grow, whether you are a client of CoachStation or not. CS CoachBot is designed to meet you where you are, offering guidance that is accessible, practical, and grounded in real coaching experience.

With CS CoachBot alongside you, the path to stronger leadership, better connection, and lasting development is always open.

Give it a try and continue to experiment through queries and questions. Like existing users, you will be surprised at the relevance and benefit.

Feel free to Email, Print or Share and Comment.

Coaching, CoachStation, Communication, Leadership, Leadership Development, Relationships, Trust

Management: Communication and Accountability In One-On-Ones

Few managers and leaders are conducting useful one-on-ones and when they do, often miss the mark in making them effective and productive. There is value in learning how to facilitate a one-on-one that provides value for all involved.

Two of the most important, yet under-rated skills for managers and leaders are listening and questioning. To be present and focused and know what key question to ask at the right time add value to any relationship and discussion. They are particularly important during one-on-ones with your employees and offer a couple of great examples of development opportunities. Yet, there are many more growth areas that can be learned and practiced as a leader through focused, individual time spent with each team member.

One-on-ones are a tool and a process. When conducted well they are an incredibly useful and effective part of leadership and developing effective relationships. The opposite is just as true. When avoided, gaps and misunderstandings often exist as a direct result. Your willingness to learn how to conduct one-on-ones effectively will have a direct impact on your team and your results. Outcomes and benefits include; each team member will be more engaged; trust is increased; the leader an employee earn the right to be heard; influence improves; and you both earn the right to discuss relevant, meaningful topics.

The most effective one-on-ones are action-oriented and holistic in their approach. This means that all aspects of the employee’s performance and mindset are discussed.

If you aren’t having one on ones with your team, you’re missing out on an incredible motivating, problem solving, pressure relieving opportunity to help and grow your team. But even if you’re totally bought into starting them, it can be intimidating to actually get started. Like the first time for many things, when you start, it’s easy to feel unsure what to do. When you start, there can be many questions like:

What do I talk about?
What do I say to my team?
How often should I have them?
What if my team doesn’t want to talk to me?
When should I schedule them?
…and many more. (3)

All good questions that are addressed in this blog. But, first things first.

It is of great interest to me how few managers bother with meeting formally in any capacity on a regular basis with their team members. Taking this one step further, it is a shame how many managers avoid this key part of their role. It is too easy to get caught up in the operational and tactical aspects of management. Being a leader compels contact and connection with your direct reports. Although many fail to make the time for this, it is in fact an obligation of being a leader. To feel the many benefits and rewards requires a conscious plan to engage and persist whilst practicing the skill-sets that make it work.

To see time dedicated to each team member as somehow negotiable misses the point regarding being a leader.

Worldwide, the percentage of adults who work full-time for an employer and are engaged at work — they are highly involved in and enthusiastic about their work and workplace — is just 15%. That low percentage of engaged employees is a barrier to creating high-performing cultures. It implies a stunning amount of wasted potential, given that business units in the top quartile of our global employee engagement database are 17% more productive and 21% more profitable than those in the bottom quartile.

Businesses that orient performance management systems around basic human needs for psychological engagement — such as positive workplace relationships, frequent recognition, ongoing performance conversations and opportunities for personal development — get the most out of their employees. (1) If spending time with your team members is not your key priority you are missing one of the most valuable aspects of your role as a leader.

Communication, clarity, context, expectation setting, checking for understanding and similar key requirements form part of this discussion.

Consolidation and reinforcement occurs in between formal sessions, during ad-hoc catch-ups. They are extremely valuable and important. However, there needs to be a formal, established rhythm where real and honest discussion can take place. This should be done in a private setting where both the leader and employee can feel comfortable to raise any relevant points. These discussions form the basis for most performance reviews and development opportunities. The chance to reduce or remove assumptions is also of great benefit.

An effective one-on-one is a discussion with purpose. It has two-way communication and feedback; invites self-assessment; invests in the relationship; and has actions and outcomes.

10 Ways Leaders Aren’t Making Time for their Team Members (Infographic): Blanchard LeaderChat

There is something to be said, however, about occasionally changing the setting. Some of the best one on one discussions I have had occurred during a walk around the block or at a cafe’.

As with all relationships, it is important to know your team members well enough to know what their preferences are.

Clearly, going for a walk with an employee with health issues might be challenging and potentially do more harm than good, for example.

I often hear statements from managers like, “my door is always open”. The assumption that this style creates opportunity for meaningful discussion is flawed.

Not all of your team members will approach you proactively to raise all of their issues and successes. Quite often the key few will ‘pop into your office’ to vent or raise concerns.

Regularly the same employees will chat about the same challenges and points, visit after visit. Reactive conversations based on specific issues become the norm.

Of course, not all of your team will approach you just because you ‘offered’, One-on-ones provide the alternative options. Personal and professional points are discussed.

You need to give these meetings a fair amount of time to make sure you really dig into issues that are bothering them, fully explore ideas with them, and have a good opportunity to coach them when needed.

You’ll also build their confidence and trust in you that when they come to you with a problem you will not only listen, but help them do something about it. (3)

One-on-ones are proactive in nature, identifying and addressing things before they escalate.

The ‘door is open approach’ is reactive and covers the select few issues that your team members choose to raise – it assumes too much and is quite a lazy approach. It is often an approach based on the manager – their fears, self-doubts and lack of confidence to manage the conversations. The one-on-one should be mostly about the employee. Conversely, relationship-based one-on-ones are proactive as they delve and discover opportunities that may not have been identified without facilitating and questioning.

The discussion is meaningful in that it maintains flow and momentum in actions, progress and meeting goals.

The ironic part of this mindset is that a focus away from your team rarely ends well. The most relevant and impactful way to be able to influence outcomes and results is via the effectiveness, capability, competence and confidence of each team member. This takes focus and development. To assume that this growth will occur without your guidance and assistance as their immediate manager/leader reflects inexperience or avoidance. Related to this, emphasis on results and outcomes without understanding the inputs and contributors drives managers towards the wrong focus. This could appear as an unsupported challenge or even worse, a threat or coercion.

I have already touched on a few key benefits of one-on-ones. However, the most important element references the risks if you don’t formalise these discussions.

What causes some people to fully commit to the team and give their max effort while others don’t? It’s trust. In research conducted by The Ken Blanchard Companies and Training Magazine, over 60% of respondents say the most important factor influencing the effort they give to a team is how much they trust their fellow teammates.

Having high trust in your teammates frees you up to focus on your own contributions without worrying about others following through on their commitments. Trusting your team gives you freedom to take risks, knowing your teammates have your back and will support you. Team trust allows you to have open and honest dialogue and healthy debate that leads to better decision-making, and conflict gets resolved productively instead of people sandbagging issues or sabotaging the efforts of others. But developing trust in your teammates doesn’t happen by accident; it takes an intentional effort to proactively build trust. (2) It is a very similar factor when considering the relationship between a leader and direct report…but, more impactful in most cases.

Trust cannot be built from afar or in spite of the effort to develop effective relationships. Regular one-on-ones provide that opportunity.

When you have scheduled the sessions, commit to them. Cancelling or constantly moving the one-on-ones sends a very clear message about your priorities. Remember, most leaders have around 160+ hours / month to accomplish their work. Focusing on the single greatest impact on the success of that work (hint: your team members) for 10-20 hours / month seems like a pretty solid investment! Let your team know you want to have one on ones to help them. If they’ve never had them before, they may not know what to expect, so it helps to give them a little background before the first one. (3) Over time, you can shift the accountability of scheduling and agenda-setting to your employee.

Regular conversations that contain actions and outcomes create a baseline for development. The CoachStation REOWM Leadership Accountability model provides a solid framework to assist in your one-on-ones. Access a copy of the REOWM model and explanations for each of the 5 steps here.

It is important to spend a few minutes preparing for each one-on-one.

Leadership expert, Kevin Eikenberry correctly states that: the best meetings have agendas, and while your one-on-one meetings likely won’t have a formal agenda (although they could), for them to be most effective and productive, both parties need to be clear on the expectations, goals, and outcomes for these meetings. Since you are likely having these meetings already without this clarity, make this a topic of conversation the next time you meet.

As a leader, don’t just assume others know what you want from these meetings – talk to them and share your needs and goals for your one-on-ones.

As a team member ask for what you need. If you are hoping for/need something from these meetings (like more direction, for example), ask for it. (4)

I have found that a consistent agenda containing 3 key elements works well in establishing a standard, expectations and agreed outcomes:

Agenda:

What’s on your mind?

What would you like to discuss?

Progress:

How have you gone since we last met?

Did your actions work?

What did you learn as a result?

How do you know they worked?

Actions:

What do you need to do to reinforce and consolidate recent learning and actions?

What have you taken away from today’s one-on-one?

Are there any new potential actions?

There is value if your team member takes control of the meeting. It may take a couple of one-on-ones for them to get comfortable and understand your expectations and how best to apply them, but it is their time, so your employee should own it. Support them into this though, being fair and clear about how this looks and what they should do.

Too often the one-on-one meeting becomes tactical and just about day to day issues and tasks.

Access additional great examples of coaching questions you can use in any discussion – 50 Power Questions

Self-assessment and reflection is generally more useful than solely providing feedback. You will find that through asking the right questions and listening well, there is much to learn about each person. You can then provide your own thoughts and feedback throughout the discussion, in response to your employee. It may seem subtle but is actually a significant shift in accountability and ownership. It also makes the session easier for the leader as they quickly learn that they don’t have to have all the answers. These details are important, but if you want to have more effective and valuable one-on-one meetings, think bigger picture.

As a leader, be observant, and make coaching and feedback a part of the list of things you routinely talk about in these meetings. Consider asking for feedback on your performance too.

As a team member, if you want more feedback in general, or specific guidance on a situation, ask for it. The one-on-one meeting is a time you will have your leader’s attention, so use it to get the feedback you need. (4) Regular follow-up and development of accountability provides momentum and progression.

Monthly meetings are ok, however fortnightly is best in my experience. It is generally better to conduct fortnightly one-on-ones of 45 minutes in length compared to monthly sessions of an hour or longer.

This does depend on the number of direct reports, employee tenure and competence, amongst other judgements you must make. Finally, a good rule-of -thumb to follow is to make sure that each one-on-one covers 3 key categories. Assuming a 60 minute session is scheduled, break the session into thirds or 20-minute segments:

- 20 minutes: Tasks = Focus on results, tasks and operational work i.e. the things that your employee does.

- 20 minutes: Self = Self-reflection and discussion regarding the employee themselves – how do they feel? What is going well? What isn’t?

- 20 minutes: Others = Feedback and self-assessment regarding their relationships – with you as their leader; with their peers; with their direct reports; other relationships e.g stakeholders.

The timing of 20 minutes for each segment is indicative and obviously can be altered, depending on the conversation and flow. The critical aspect is that all 3 elements are covered during each session.

Without a doubt the biggest challenge for most managers is to conduct a one-on-one at all.

Feedback I receive is that most managers don’t conduct one-on-ones and if they do, they are not that useful because they focus solely on segment 1 – results, KPI’s and tasks. Greater improvement and objectivity is gained when the leader focuses on how the results are achieved. You cannot influence a number or historical result. This information is important to identify insights and trends, leading to potential actions. But, in itself, it offers little direction or future action. Identifying why the results are what they are has purpose and potential for goal establishment.

One-on-ones are a critical aspect of leadership. This time together provides opportunities that do not present themselves to the same depth through casual, ad-hoc discussions. If you are a leader and have read this far, I encourage you to reflect on the progress and effectiveness of your one-on-ones and your team.

It’s a problem to be unaware of this aspect of your role. However, it is negligent to gain awareness and continue to miss the opportunity. As always, it is your call, but your team members will ultimately thank you for meeting your responsibilities and assisting them via facilitating useful, engaging and purposeful one-on-ones.

Resources:

(1) State of the Global Workplace 2017: Gallup Global Report

(2) The 1 Factor That Determines How Hard Your Team Works: Blanchard LeadershipChat

(3) Manager’s Guide: How To Start One On One’s With Your Team: Lighthouse

(4) 5 Ways To improve Your One-On_one Meetings: Kevin Eikenberry, Leadership Digital

Feel free to Email, Print or Share and Comment.

Coaching, Leadership, Leadership Development, People Development

Avoid a Common Leadership Mistake: Empower Your Team

Effective leaders make shared goals clear. They also clarify the role we each play in achieving them.

Leaders empower their team members and hold them accountable for delivering agreed results.

However, to inspire and empower you must have a connection with your team members…a relationship.

The words and concept in the heading above could not be clearer. The message and need to establish accountability cannot be understated. Making this real in practice is the challenge.

How many of us truly provide the context and create the environment where trust and accountability are encouraged? Do you empower or dis-empower?

A few weeks ago I facilitated a ‘Lunch and Learn’ session with one of my clients. The session formed part of a week-long focus on leadership. Other speakers included representatives from Blanchard International and BTS Australasia. I was provided with guidance on the session topic, which had to relate to coaching and leadership. We were fortunate to have Max from Sketchvideos recording the key points from each session, as highlighted in the image above.

Many of us have the opportunity to influence, lead and manage people either directly or indirectly every day. Like most leadership and people-related skills, this requires practice and effort. It is important to understand the key points and areas to focus on and practice whilst developing yourself and those around you. In the lunch and learn sessions, I discussed the core traits and skills that the most effective leaders possess and apply every day.

To empower is to provide opportunity for buy-in and success for individual employees and your team overall.

One of the most important, yet often missed elements is to establish agreed expectations and standards. Clarity of expectations provides a greater chance that your team members will complete tasks and actions in an efficient and timely way. It is virtually impossible for an employee to feel empowered if there is disagreement or misunderstanding in what they are expected to do each day. Most critically, clarity allows each person to engage in their roles and hold themselves accountable.

Most managers are more comfortable discussing and holding team members accountable for the objective aspects of their role for example KPI’s; KRA’s; results etc. They are often less comfortable influencing the ‘seemingly subjective’ aspects of the role. As highlighted in the associated graphic, we often do more talking and telling than asking and listening. This is particularly prevalent when managing people, during 1:1’s and appraisal-type discussions.

By telling and informing, the leader is assuming a lot and making it more about themselves. Who’s 1:1 is it anyway?

Too often managers are fearful about how to establish expectations and hold these conversations. Particularly when the goals and standards are seemingly subjective and are less quantifiable. With the right skills and practice, accountability is possible to apply, no matter the details of the performance expectation or requirement.

Once agreed, the commitment to meet the expectation is implicit, whether objective or subjective in nature.

It is worth considering whether this point applies to you? Take a moment to reflect on how often you deliberately focus on agreed expectations. Check in with your team…you may be surprised at the response. Additionally, there are other skills and traits that employees look for in their leaders. The graphic below highlights a recent survey that asked which leadership traits and skills were most important.

Whereas, most of them are reasonably obvious, we can all think of manager’s who fail more than succeed in demonstrating the skills through action. The skills can be developed. What is one of the best ways to influence most, if not all, of the leadership skills listed above? Coaching! Being coached and developing others through coaching has tangible and measurable benefits. Many of these outcomes are the skills that our employees are looking for. How do we know this? Because feedback and survey after survey tells us so.

A leader only has to become moderately proficient in most of the skills above to be an effective and productive leader. Perfection across all skills is not required. In fact, it is not possible. However, taking the time and putting conscious effort into growth and development provides many benefits…to yourself and your team. Although, it is worth remembering that knowing and doing are not the same thing! Oddly, they are the same traits and attributes you are looking from from your leaders. Yet, we often see what we provide and what we get in different contexts and degrees of self-expectation.

Genuine progress is made through taking action, developing skills and closing any gaps.

Managers can attest to this experience: You ask an employee to carry out a task that has enough flexibility for creative input. Rather than making their own decisions, the employee comes to you with an onslaught of questions, trying to pin down the exact parameters of the task. You become exasperated, wondering why the employee has to ask you permission for every tiny detail.

This isn’t an unusual phenomenon – it can be difficult to break out of the leader-follower mindset at the workplace. In fact, researchers from Penn State, Claremont McKenna College, and Tsinghua University find that only rare, “transformational leaders” are able to prevent employees from being excessively reliant on their bosses, cultivating instead a staff that feels empowered and self-guided.

Trust and business acumen are some of the cornerstones in building this type of work culture.

We can use this wisdom to train informed and decisive teams that we can trust. (1)

To empower is to provide opportunity for involvement and input into the conversation; understand what matters most to each person; and have a say into the work being performed.

In Eyewitness to Power, David Gergen writes, “At the heart of leadership is the leader’s relationship with followers. People will entrust their hopes and dreams to another person only if they think the other is a reliable vessel.”

There was a time when leaders thought their role was to exert power over others. No longer. Today’s best leaders recognise their leadership is most effective when they empower others to step up and lead. That’s exactly what the new generation of Gen X and Millennials expect from their leaders, and they respond with great performance.

With leadership comes responsibility. As Clayton Christensen wrote, “No other occupation offers as many ways to help others learn and grow, take responsibility and be recognised for achievement.”

It’s time to lead authentically. You can do so by focusing on empowering others.

A team of empowered leaders all rowing in the same direction is hard to beat. (2) It is only when we mature and grow as leaders that we realise most people have at least a general understanding of their own performance, successes and future development opportunities. Gaining more context through asking; developing a stronger connection and trust; and setting up the opportunity for more productive relationships ongoing, are all benefits. But, we don’t provide enough guidance through facilitating a discussion to help our employees draw these conclusions. These behaviours are most commonly a result of:

Avoidance and fear of our own capability to assist – “I won’t ask the question as I may not be able to do anything with the answer”
Prior poor examples, experiences or situations that have created self-doubt
Lack of skill and capability to lead
Selfishness – simply not caring enough about members of your team to bother (a strong indicator that this type of manager shouldn’t be leading teams in the first place!!)

The desire to build leadership skill takes time…just like every other skill or capability you have developed.

To coach and lead is to empower. But, we all must develop the capability to do this well. The graphic below provides a set of guidelines about how to hold an effective 1:1 and coach accordingly. You will notice there are more questions that statements. Your opinion and view can be fed into the conversation as it develops. Stop and consider whether a question may be more effective and provide greater understanding than a statement would.

Giving up control and empowering your team can be a terrifying experience for many leaders. You might feel compelled to watch their every move and peek over their shoulders. But by monitoring someone’s every move, you’re actually impeding his or her ability to grow.

Give your team some space, trust them, and you might be impressed by what they’re able to achieve.

Breaking out of the traditional leader-follower mindset can help you create stronger staff bonds founded on trust, self-confidence, and achievement. When you create room for independent work and decision-making, your team might discover that they’re able to achieve far more than they originally thought possible. Test drive these leadership techniques, and see what your own team is really capable of. (1)

How do you think you might use this information to empower and assist your team?

Resources:

(1) Forbes.com

(2) Huffington Post

Feel free to Email, Print or Share and Comment.

Coaching, CoachStation, Leadership, Leadership Development

Expectations, Accountability and Leadership

As a leader, you are required to clearly set expectations and standards for your team and each individual employee.

We continue to see that this is an area within organisations that is not as effectively applied as it should be.

In our short video you will learn why setting expectations is more important than ever to ensure that your team members are not only aware of but understand what is required and expected of them in their role. We have observed some organisations and leaders who hold their employees to account unfairly, sometimes for things that have not been established clearly or understood in the first place.

It is never too late to review where this aspect of leadership sits with you and your team. Maybe it is time to revisit your team’s roles and make sure their is clarity, certainty and context…the risk is minor and the potential returns are significant.
One of our recent blogs on this topic struck a nerve with many of my clients and readers and I felt it necessary to follow it up with additional content: Leadership: Setting Standards and Expectations.

Often leaders are wary of providing their own view as it is seen as subjective. Don’t be frightened to seek and provide this detail. Particularly when respect and trust exist, a simple acknowledgement or recognition of progress can be the difference between an engaged and disengaged employee.

The CoachStation REOWM Model of Leadership and Accountability provides additional context and opportunity to embed a structure that supports and encourages input from your team. Feel free to use the model, share it with your team and let me know how you go. If you have any questions, don’t hesitate to drop us a line as we are always willing to assist you and your organisation.

Feel free to Email, Print or Share and Comment.

Coaching, CoachStation, Leadership, Leadership Development, Mentoring

Coaching and Mentoring – The Need For Accountability

To genuinely succeed in business, leaders must know their role, continuously develop their skills and be constantly supported to achieve the best they can as a leader and employee.

Finding your own development pathway takes ownership, effort and clarity. However, it is not something you need to do on your own. Whether it is developing yourself or your team, coaching and mentoring can be a powerful tool to enable change and growth, both personally and professionally. When it comes to leadership development, however, one of the keys to success is to start developing deliberately and early.

It is problematic to concern yourself with focusing on developing leadership skills after they are needed.

Setting up leaders to thrive through a development program both prior to and during their tenure is key to the success of your leadership team and business. Training in itself is one source of development, however this learning must be supported and reinforced in practice based on individual situations, needs, understanding and capability. Ongoing support ‘makes the learning real’ within the work environment, reinforcing the content and context provided during training.

CoachStation: Coaching and Mentoring Pathway

Image by Nick Scheerbart, Unsplash

As referenced on my CoachStation website, there are many reasons why organisations and people seek coaching and mentoring solutions, with a variety of benefits and outcomes accessed depending on individual needs.

Coaching and mentoring are increasingly sought after tools, accessed by business leaders and organisations eager to dedicate development time and resources at an individual level. Organisations are finding that this form of development is both good for business and employees.

Benefit and improvement is seen in areas such as: improved work performance; better client and customer service; increased confidence; effective leadership; enhanced relationships; more robust succession planning and increased goal achievement. Additionally, personal development improves self-esteem, self-awareness and other attributes which provides a stronger platform for you to succeed at work and at home.

When I am coaching and mentoring, the coachee and I work together on both a professional and personal level. It is virtually impossible to delineate between the ‘home’ and ‘work’ person, with situations, personalities, values and other traits being a consistent influence on coaching success. The benefits and rewards are often significant, however being coached and mentored takes effort and accountability. I recently read an excellent blog by Joanna Maynard which highlights the importance of ownership and accountability in self-development:

I like Ben Franklin’s idea about not giving others advice: “Wise men don’t need advice. Fools won’t take it.” I think this highlights a cornerstone of coaching. Unlike consulting, where the consultant is an expert who gathers information and then gives advice, the coach is more of a facilitator. A large part of a coach’s role is to draw out wisdom already inside the client so that the client may discover solutions for themselves.

I often hear people talk about what to consider when shopping for a coach. They may want a coach who has worked in their industry, or in a similar role to theirs, or at their level of management. I don’t think these should be the only—or even the top—criteria.

In fact, one of the most important factors in whether a coaching experience is successful centers on a quality that must be present not in the coach but in the client. Some call it coachability: the client’s willingness to discover their own wisdom and, once found, to act on it.

Effective coaches employ strong skills to facilitate client-discovered wisdom. Coaches help clients focus on their most important area of concern, define what they want, and determine what that looks like. Coaches ask questions that aid the client’s own discovery—questions that expand the client’s perspective and inspire them to take risks. To accomplish this, effective coaches create a safe, trusting environment in which their clients can do this important work. But the client also has a major role in creating this environment. They need to be coachable. Here are just a few ways you can enhance your own coach-ability:

Be willing to think and act differently in the future, even if your current ways of doing things have resulted in success.

Don’t hesitate to break free from old habits.

Take the time, and make the effort, to clarify your values and the parts of yourself you would like to develop.

Trust yourself enough to take action—sometimes bold action—as a result of your newly discovered knowledge. Since being coachable means being willing to be vulnerable, it must be noted that coaching is not the same as therapy. A coach is not going to ask a client to delve deeply into their past personal life. There is a real possibility that this concern stops some people from hiring a coach or using one fully.

Also noteworthy: in coaching, the client not the coach drives the agenda. This means the client doesn’t have to talk about anything they don’t want to talk about. They must, however, be coachable—willing to explore, discover their own wisdom, think differently, and stretch themselves. If they do this, most of the time the reward will far outweigh the effort.

So when interviewing a coach, think less about the coach’s track record and more about whether you want to take this person with you on your journey of growth and discovery.You might be thinking I’m not planning to hire a coach anytime soon—how does this apply to me? Allow me to challenge your question with a few questions of my own:

In terms of your own growth, are you actively creating an effective learning environment?

Are you open to expanding your thinking, clarifying your values, and taking bold action?

If you answered no, what are you going to do about it? (1)

There is a genuine need for the person being coached and mentored to take ownership of their own development. Interestingly, this can sometimes be a bit of a surprise to some coachees. There is no ‘silver bullet’ or fast-tracking, but the benefits can be very worthwhile when accountability and effort become part of the coaching and mentoring process.

There are a few discernible differences between coaching and mentoring, however the core development and outcomes remain consistent. In coaching it is primarily about understanding the coachees situation and then facilitating and guiding to discover potential actions and goals, mostly derived from the coachee. When mentoring, it is often about the mentor providing advice and using their own experiences to help the person being mentored. Slightly different skills and inputs, yet in both cases the focus is on the future aspirations, goals and actions of the person being assisted. In my experience, the most successful coaching and mentoring environments are created when a person:

is committed to the program
is willing and able to develop trust between the coach/mentor and themselves
is committed and works on the content in practice between sessions
has a leader who actively supports them in their development
recognises that there are no short-cuts
understands that coaching and mentoring are just part of the story or journey.

One of the additional paybacks is that as a participant, your own coaching and mentoring skills develop along the way. This improved skillset provides an excellent resource for you to help others in a similar way, whether they are your direct reports, peers or others within or external to the organisation. When applied well, coaching and mentoring can:

Inspire shared learning: Leadership can be lonely. Leaders often feel isolated, unable or unwilling to share information with team members and they feel as though they need to have all the answers, which can be quite stressful.
Encourage people to understand themselves: The CoachStation Coaching model works through the coachees situation, identifying development areas and opportunities for growth and improvement. We use many different tools and resources, all designed as triggers for self-awareness, discussion-points and clarity – targeted and individualised programs focus on the ‘right’ area that will provide the most benefit.
Inspire and enable honesty: In the workplace, employees are often allowed to avoid confrontation. They sidestep challenges, procrastinate and sometimes actively or passively refuse to address things that matter the most – few people like confrontation, but when avoided, problems continue to build.
Support change: During inductions, for newly promoted staff and other business needs, change can be supported through coaching and mentoring – the commitment to develop each persons skills and competencies.
Create opportunity for self-development: Leading to confidence and strength in developing others, a critical step in a leaders development.

When I am coaching the focus of the program is quite often leadership development, however each client has their own unique situation, personality, challenges and other elements to be considered in the process. Experience has shown me that through a structured coaching and mentoring program you will see and feel a difference…and so will those around you.

It is a great time to consider whether you or one of your team would benefit from participation in our coaching and mentoring program.

I am more than happy to be contacted if you wish to discuss how I can assist you, your organisation or members of your team. In the meantime, reflecting on your own development opportunities and accountability is a great place to start. After all, self-development can only happen because you care enough to take the first (or next) steps.

Reference:

Are You Coachable? 3 Questions to Consider: Joanna Maynard, Blanchard Leaderchat

Feel free to Email, Print or Share and Comment.

Tag Archive for: Accountability

The Peter Principle Is Not Theory. It Is Your Organisation.

The Peter Principle, And Why It Still Matters

What the Research Has Since Confirmed

Promotion Without Preparation Is Not a Gap. It Is a Decision.

What This Looks Like in Practice

The Hidden Cost: Quiet Leadership Failure Is Still Failure

What Quiet Leadership Failure Actually Looks Like

The Framing Problem

Falling Into Leadership: When Theory Becomes Someone's Reality

Why Narrative Matters in Leadership Work

The Solution: Leadership Infrastructure, Not a Development Program

A Closed-Loop Response to a Systemic Problem

The Commercial Argument

Stop Talking About Development. Start Talking About Risk.

How I Know When Coaching Has Actually Worked

Most managers don’t set out to fail – but many do

Why leadership coaching is a high-ROI investment

Coaching as strategic advantage, not just remediation

How my internal scale links to real-world impact

The increments are experience-based pattern recognition, not mathematical

This is how real expertise works

What a 7/10 actually is

What an >7/10 actually is

Why some sessions sit at 7, even when the work is excellent

From individual shifts to coaching culture

The point of naming this

Key takeaways

Practical actions you can use immediately

Leadership Coaching and Mentoring

References and sources

1. Spot the Pattern Early

2. Name and Frame What You See

3. Shift from Emotion to Agency

4. Stop the Rescue Loop

5. Apply Structure with REOWM

6. Hold the Line Consistently

Conclusion

Practical Next Steps

Leadership Coaching and Mentoring

In a world where leadership moves fast, CS CoachBot gives you on-demand support, clarity, and tools to lead with confidence, no matter the challenge.

CS CoachBot gives you instant access to practical leadership insights, coaching tools, and support, anytime you need it.

It’s like having a coach in your pocket, helping you think clearly, lead better, and stay on track.

Most Common ThemesTo Date

The Struggle with Delegation and Control

Defining Your ‘Why’

Effective Communication and Feedback

Goal Setting and Team Building

Few managers and leaders are conducting useful one-on-ones and when they do, often miss the mark in making them effective and productive. There is value in learning how to facilitate a one-on-one that provides value for all involved.

The most effective one-on-ones are action-oriented and holistic in their approach. This means that all aspects of the employee’s performance and mindset are discussed.

To see time dedicated to each team member as somehow negotiable misses the point regarding being a leader.

Communication, clarity, context, expectation setting, checking for understanding and similar key requirements form part of this discussion.

An effective one-on-one is a discussion with purpose. It has two-way communication and feedback; invites self-assessment; invests in the relationship; and has actions and outcomes.

One-on-ones are proactive in nature, identifying and addressing things before they escalate.

The discussion is meaningful in that it maintains flow and momentum in actions, progress and meeting goals.

I have already touched on a few key benefits of one-on-ones. However, the most important element references the risks if you don’t formalise these discussions.

Trust cannot be built from afar or in spite of the effort to develop effective relationships. Regular one-on-ones provide that opportunity.

It is important to spend a few minutes preparing for each one-on-one.

Too often the one-on-one meeting becomes tactical and just about day to day issues and tasks.

Monthly meetings are ok, however fortnightly is best in my experience. It is generally better to conduct fortnightly one-on-ones of 45 minutes in length compared to monthly sessions of an hour or longer.

Without a doubt the biggest challenge for most managers is to conduct a one-on-one at all.

Effective leaders make shared goals clear. They also clarify the role we each play in achieving them.

Leaders empower their team members and hold them accountable for delivering agreed results.

However, to inspire and empower you must have a connection with your team members…a relationship.

How many of us truly provide the context and create the environment where trust and accountability are encouraged? Do you empower or dis-empower?

To empower is to provide opportunity for buy-in and success for individual employees and your team overall.

By telling and informing, the leader is assuming a lot and making it more about themselves. Who’s 1:1 is it anyway?

Once agreed, the commitment to meet the expectation is implicit, whether objective or subjective in nature.

Genuine progress is made through taking action, developing skills and closing any gaps.

Trust and business acumen are some of the cornerstones in building this type of work culture.

To empower is to provide opportunity for involvement and input into the conversation; understand what matters most to each person; and have a say into the work being performed.

It’s time to lead authentically. You can do so by focusing on empowering others.

The desire to build leadership skill takes time…just like every other skill or capability you have developed.

Give your team some space, trust them, and you might be impressed by what they’re able to achieve.

As a leader, you are required to clearly set expectations and standards for your team and each individual employee.

We continue to see that this is an area within organisations that is not as effectively applied as it should be.

To genuinely succeed in business, leaders must know their role, continuously develop their skills and be constantly supported to achieve the best they can as a leader and employee.

It is problematic to concern yourself with focusing on developing leadership skills after they are needed.

Coaching and mentoring are increasingly sought after tools, accessed by business leaders and organisations eager to dedicate development time and resources at an individual level. Organisations are finding that this form of development is both good for business and employees.

It is a great time to consider whether you or one of your team would benefit from participation in our coaching and mentoring program.